EI
EXPONENT INC (EXPO)·Q2 2026 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Note: As of Nov 20, 2025, Exponent has reported Q2 fiscal 2025 (ended Jul 4, 2025); Q2 fiscal 2026 results are not yet available. This recap uses Q2 fiscal 2025 results and trends through Q3 fiscal 2025.
- Q2 delivered net revenues of $132.9M and diluted EPS of $0.52, modestly above S&P Global consensus on both revenue and EPS; EBITDA margin was 27.8% amid lower utilization and higher other operating expenses tied to the Phoenix lease extension.
- Management maintained full‑year FY25 revenue guidance in Q2, then raised FY25 margin guidance in Q3 to 27.4–27.65%, while announcing a $100M increase to the repurchase authorization—key positive catalysts into year‑end.
- Mix improved in disputes/litigation (construction, automotive, medical devices) while environmental/health declined on chemical regulatory softness; early-stage traction in digital health, AI usability, distributed energy systems supports medium‑term growth.
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Disputes work grew in construction, automotive and medical devices, supporting a resilient performance despite macro uncertainty. “Second quarter revenues were flat but exceeded expectations, reflecting our team’s disciplined execution and resilience.” — Dr. Catherine Corrigan
- Early-stage momentum in digital health and AI usability; Exponent’s multidisciplinary expertise positions it to capture demand from safety‑critical AI integration across industries.
- Rate realization remained strong (+5% YoY in Q2), reflecting premium positioning and differentiated interdisciplinary talent.
What Went Wrong
- Utilization fell to 72.1% (from 75.1%), partly due to the July 4 timing and onboarding of new hires; billable hours declined 6% YoY.
- Environmental & Health segment decreased 4% YoY in Q2, driven by lower proactive life sciences and chemical regulatory activity.
- Chemical regulatory engagements faced delays amid EPA staffing turnover; management cited “wait and see” behavior and timing slowdowns at the regulator.
Financial Results
Quarterly progression
YoY comparison
Estimates vs Actuals (S&P Global)
Values with asterisk (*) retrieved from S&P Global.
Segment breakdown (mix)
Segment YoY growth (quarterly)
KPIs
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “Second quarter revenues were flat but exceeded expectations… momentum in early-stage work related to digital health, AI usability, and distributed energy systems.” — Dr. Catherine Corrigan, CEO
- “EBITDA margin decreased primarily due to the decrease in utilization and increase in other operating expenses largely associated with the Phoenix land lease renewal… and a decrease in miscellaneous income due to the loss of a tenant in our Menlo Park facility.” — Richard Schlenker, CFO
- “We are returning to headcount growth… expect at year end that headcount will be approximately 4% higher than at the start of the year.” — CFO
- “As AI is increasingly integrated into safety‑critical systems… our teams are at the forefront of addressing… complex technical and human‑machine challenges.” — CEO (Q3 commentary underscores medium‑term positioning)
Q&A Highlights
- Utilization drivers: ~300bps decline YoY—about half due to July 4 timing, half due to onboarding hires and normalization after elevated prior‑year utilization.
- Tariff/regulatory impacts: chemical regulatory work saw “wait and see” delays; medical device regulatory demand remained resilient with sophisticated lab testing and advisory work.
- Reactive vs proactive: both grew ~1% YoY; disputes work within reactive up ~7% YoY, offset by step‑down in larger regulatory matters.
- 2026 prelim thoughts: starting 2026 with ~4% headcount growth, rate realization normalizing to ~2.5–3.5%, utilization foundation ~72%—setting up for healthier algorithmic growth.
Estimates Context
- Q2 actuals were modest beats: net revenues $132.9M vs S&P Global consensus $130.8M*, and diluted EPS $0.52 vs $0.516*—driven by strong disputes work and solid rate realization despite lower utilization.
- With FY25 margin guidance raised in Q3 to 27.4–27.65%, consensus margin expectations likely need upward adjustment; revenue trajectory maintained low single digits due to calendar headwind (return to 52‑week year).
- Consensus depth was limited (# of estimates = 3*)—magnifying the impact of operational signals (utilization, rate realization, headcount trajectory) on forward estimate revisions. Values with asterisk (*) retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Quality beat: modest revenue/EPS beats with strong disputes demand and premium rate realization; monitor normalization of utilization into H2.
- Margin trajectory improved: FY25 EBITDA margin guidance raised twice by Q3; near‑term catalysts include Q4 guide and buyback capacity.
- Secular growth vectors: early‑stage AI usability, digital health, and distributed energy systems align with Exponent’s failure analysis and human‑machine expertise.
- Watch regulatory timing: EPA‑related chemical regulatory delays represent near‑term friction; medical device regulatory work remains robust.
- Utilization and headcount: returning to headcount growth with utilization ~72% target—sets the stage for an improved “growth algorithm” in 2026.
- Capital returns: consistent $0.30 quarterly dividend and expanded $100M buyback authorization support TSR and downside protection into year‑end.
- Trading setup: narrative skew positive on margin/repurchases; monitor Q4 demand (consumer electronics recovery) and expense cadence (managers meeting) for near‑term EPS prints.